↑↓ move↵ open[] previous / next lesson? all shortcuts
Appearance
Theme
Type size
Reading

Focus mode hides the sidebars. Press f to toggle it anywhere.

Keyboard shortcuts
/
Search
[ ]
Previous / next lesson
t
Jump to the table of contents
r
Review queue
f
Focus mode
?
This panel
Reference10 min

The safety charter

Two rules you will never break, and the reasoning behind each. The seriousness with which you treat this is itself a credential.

On this page10 min
  1. The smaller rules
  2. The test
  3. Why this is a credential

This site puts on people, starting with you. Two rules cover almost everything, and the rest of the page explains why each one exists, because a rule you understand is one you will keep when nobody is watching.

Rule one. Anything connected to a body runs from batteries, with no conductive path to the wall.

Rule two. You never stimulate your own or anyone else’s nervous system outside an IRB-approved lab with a principal investigator.

Here is why. The wall is 120 volts. Every device plugged into it has a small to its own chassis and ground, normally harmless, because you are not connected to it with a low-resistance path. with conductive paste are exactly that path. A fault in a cheap charger, a frayed cord, or simply the ordinary leakage of a power supply can put current through you, and current through the chest at the tens-of-milliamp level is how people die. The medical standard for equipment that touches a patient, , limits to a few tens of microamps, a thousand times smaller than the fault current a wall supply can deliver.

A battery cannot do this. Its total energy is small and it has no path to the wall. This is also why hospitals use isolated power and why the AD8232 , like every biopotential chip’s , tells you the same thing in smaller print.

Figure 1. The whole of rule one, on one rail. The three red marks are what the wall can deliver through a low-resistance electrode path. The three green ones are what the standards allow and what a battery behind a resistor can physically produce. There is nothing in between to negotiate with.

The reasoning. A milliamp through the scalp is not dangerous in the electrocution sense, which is exactly why people do it at home. The dangers are different: skin burns from electrochemistry at the , which are well documented in the self-experimenter forums; unknown effects of stimulating tissue you cannot see, in a brain that is still developing into your mid-twenties; and, for vestibular and magnetic stimulation, falls and seizures. The evidence that these techniques do anything useful at home is weak, so you would be taking a real risk for a speculative benefit. Learn the circuits. Read the literature carefully; the Phase 6 project has you build a stimulator and test it in a saline bath, where it belongs. Then, if you want to run a stimulation study, join a lab that does it.

The smaller rules

The test

If you would not put it on a ten-year-old cousin, do not put it on yourself.

Why this is a credential

Every device company you might work for lives inside and . An undergraduate who can explain limits, who has run their prototypes from batteries because they understood why, and who declined to self-stimulate because the risk-benefit did not justify it, sounds in an interview like someone who can be trusted with a patient. That is rarer than technical skill.

Recall
State rule one of the safety charter and the reason for it.
Anything connected to a body runs from batteries with no conductive path to the wall. Wall-powered equipment can leak or fault current through a low-resistance electrode path; IEC 60601 limits patient leakage to tens of microamps, which only isolation or batteries can guarantee.
Recall
Why is the Arduino the most common way rule one gets broken?
The amplifier is on batteries, but the Arduino is plugged into a charging laptop, so its ground, and therefore the amplifier's reference, is tied to the wall.
Recall
Why does the site forbid home tDCS even though the current is not dangerous in the electrocution sense?
The risks are electrochemical skin burns, unknown effects on developing brain tissue, and for other modalities falls and seizures, taken for a benefit the evidence does not support. Stimulation belongs under an IRB with a PI.