↑↓ move↵ open[] previous / next lesson? all shortcuts
Appearance
Theme
Type size
Reading

Focus mode hides the sidebars. Press f to toggle it anywhere.

Keyboard shortcuts
/
Search
[ ]
Previous / next lesson
t
Jump to the table of contents
r
Review queue
f
Focus mode
?
This panel
Explainer10 min

The Utah Array, a history

From a Utah bioengineering lab in the late 1980s to the electrode in nearly every human intracortical BCI study, with the company, the regulatory path, and the limits that the next generation is trying to pass. Local history that happens to be the field's history.

AssumesElectrode materials and the foreign body responseSpineMaterials / microfabricationAnalog / mixed-signal hardware
On this page10 min
  1. The idea
  2. From cats to humans
  3. The company
  4. The regulatory path
  5. The limits
  6. Why it matters that it was here

The is a four-millimetre square of silicon with a hundred needles, each 1 to 1.5 millimetres long, tipped with platinum or iridium oxide, arranged in a ten-by-ten grid. It was developed in Richard Normann’s laboratory in the University of Utah’s bioengineering department starting in the late 1980s, originally as a possible visual prosthesis, and it became the of record for human brain-computer interfaces. Nearly every person who has moved a cursor, a robotic arm, or a speech with their thoughts has done it through one. It was invented where you are studying.

The idea

  1. Late 1980sThe ideaRichard Normann's laboratory at the University of Utah etches a bed of needles from a single block of silicon, so that a hundred electrodes can be made as one part.
  2. 1991The array describedThe three-dimensional electrode array is published. Cortical recordings in animals follow through the decade.
  3. 1990sInsertion solvedA pneumatic inserter drives the array in fast enough to pierce the pia without compressing the cortex, which is what makes chronic use possible at all.
  4. 2004BrainGate, first humanMatthew Nagle controls a cursor from motor cortex. The array is the recording front end.
  5. 2000s onwardThe companyCyberkinetics, then Blackrock Neurotech in Salt Lake City, which still makes it.
  6. NowThe regulatory positionInvestigational device exemptions, not an approved product. Every human study runs under an IDE with an IRB.
  7. The limits it is judged against now are its own: stiff silicon, a tether to the skull, a percutaneous pedestal, and a channel count fixed at a hundred. Every next-generation device is an answer to one of those four.
Figure 1. Forty years, from a silicon etching idea in a Utah lab to the electrode behind nearly every human intracortical result. Note the eighteen years between the idea and the first human.

Normann wanted to stimulate visual cortex to produce for the blind and needed many penetrating a millimetre into the cortex, spaced closely. Existing microwires were placed one at a time. The array’s manufacturing insight was to make all hundred needles from one silicon block: dice a grid of deep cuts, etch the resulting columns into sharp tapered needles in acid, insulate them, and expose and metallize the tips. The process, refined by Patrick Rousche, Kelly Jones, and others through the 1990s, produced arrays whose geometry was reproducible, which made them a research tool rather than a craft object.

From cats to humans

Recording rather than stimulation turned out to be the first application. The array recorded populations of neurons in cat and monkey cortex through the 1990s, and the Utah group and others showed that its hundred channels captured enough of motor cortex to decode arm movement. BrainGate, the academic consortium led from Brown University, implanted the first array in a person with tetraplegia in 2004; he moved a cursor, opened email, and controlled a prosthetic hand. Every human intracortical result for the next two decades (cursor control, robotic arms, handwriting at 90 characters per minute, speech at 60 to 80 words per minute, touch feedback through microstimulation) used .

The company

Cyberkinetics licensed the technology for the first human work, then Blackrock Microsystems, founded in Salt Lake City in 2008 by Marcus Gerhardt and Florian Solzbacher (a Utah faculty member and Nanofab director), took over manufacturing. Blackrock, now Blackrock Neurotech, made the arrays and the recording systems for the entire human field, obtained the first FDA clearance for a -based system for research use in humans, and has for a system aimed at paralysis. The Utah Slanted Array, with graded needle lengths for peripheral nerves, is the same platform pointed at a different tissue and is the basis of Greg Clark’s and the NeuroRobotics lab’s work on restoring touch to amputees.

The regulatory path

The array reached humans through investigational device exemptions: research-use studies under and FDA oversight, a handful of participants at a time, for two decades. No system is approved as a treatment; every participant has been in a trial. Blackrock’s clearance covers the array as a research recording device. The approval of any intracortical as a therapy, by anyone, has not yet happened, and its path (a pivotal trial, a , a reimbursement code) is what the industry is now walking.

The limits

Ninety-six channels, when modern probes have a thousand or more. Rigid silicon, with the tissue response described in the materials explainer: recording yield declines over years. A percutaneous pedestal through the skin for the cable, which is an infection risk and the thing patients most want gone. A fixed 1.5 millimetre depth that reaches layer 5 in some cortex and not others. The array was designed in an era of hand-placed microwires and was revolutionary; the next generation (flexible threads, thin-film grids, fully wireless cans) is defined largely by trying to keep what it gave and remove what it costs.

Why it matters that it was here

Because the physical center of invasive hardware is thirty minutes from campus and the people who built it are still on the faculty. Because the Nanofab that makes new trains student users. Because the history above means that a student who walks into Blackrock or Ripple with a characterized amplifier and a coated microelectrode is walking into a company that knows exactly what those are worth. The Utah map is the rest of the argument.

Recall
What was the Utah Array's original purpose, and what did it become?
A visual prosthesis for stimulating visual cortex; it became the standard recording electrode for human intracortical brain-computer interfaces.
Recall
What manufacturing idea made the Utah Array reproducible?
Making all hundred needles from a single silicon block by dicing a grid and etching the columns into tapered needles, then insulating and metallizing the tips.
Recall
What are the array's main limitations that the next generation targets?
Fixed 96 channels, rigid silicon with declining yield from the tissue response, a percutaneous pedestal for the cable, and a fixed depth.
Explain it to your roommate

Explain what this page was about to your roommate in three sentences. No jargon they would not know.